Britney lovers, don’t get mad at me, but I’m about to post a little critique of Ms. Spears for a post. I have one very popular Britney post where I lauded her comeback a few years ago when she released “Womanizer” before her album Circus came out. And yes, I do possess her Femme Fatale album (not that I understand why it’s named that, unless it’s just to signify that most of the songs are about sex).
But okay, this cover comes out and….how do I say this? It doesn’t look like her. It looks like a Photoshopped/plastic surgery version of herself. Does anyone else see this? Like, what’s going on with her chin? It’s jutting out. I think the eyes and hair are the same and I do love whatever white thing she’s wearing that is indistinguishable from the white of the cover but….Who is that? She’s done so many photo shoots where she doesn’t look completely different from one side to the other like this.
The next question is….what are you back from, Britney? With your figure? Isn’t that old news? She’s not singing live, as we all know. She still loves her some lip synching. It’s not dancing, since she can’t or doesn’t dance and gyrate nearly to the extent that she used to – like, at all.
So…back from what, exactly? Motherhood? Rehab? The mental asylum? I really don’t know.
Since I just did an album review, I won’t say much on Femme Fatale except that as I relayed to a friend of mine, it sounds rather “Britney Lite.” It’s got some great beats and I listened to it quite a bit and sure, I like it just fine. It’s no Born This Way but that’s okay. Am I going to shell out $150 or more to go see her in “concert,” though? No ma’am.
All I can say is that Britney looks pretty but there’s nothing remarkable about this cover except for the fact that whoever sliced her in real life or in Photoshop made her look like every other blonde Hollywood actress out there on the cover of a magazine.